The Way

In Neville Goddard’s teaching, the Bible is not a record of historical events but a psychological blueprint — a symbolic account of the inner workings of consciousness . Every character and incident plays out not in the world, but within you. When read in this light, the story of Abraham , Lot, and Lot’s daughters becomes a striking revelation of how assumptions shape experience — and how the mind divides and re-integrates itself in the process of transformation. Abraham and Lot: A Division Within You Abraham represents the awakened imagination — the self that walks by faith, not by sight. Lot, by contrast, symbolises the outer man — the part of you still tied to appearances, logic, and the five senses. When Abraham and Lot part ways in Genesis 13 , it isn't merely a geographic move — it’s an internal separation. The imaginal self must break from the reactive self if it is to dwell in the unseen. Lot “lifts up his eyes” and chooses the fertile plains of Jordan — a decision gr...

In the Bible, Sodom and Gomorrah stand as twin cities of destruction, consumed by fire and brimstone for their grievous sins (Genesis 18–19). Traditionally understood as moral warnings against immorality and inhospitality, Neville Goddard invites us to see these cities as states of consciousness—assumptions we harbour that, if unexamined, will inevitably collapse . The Inner “Cities” We Build Neville taught that every external circumstance is born of an internal assumption , just as the Law of Assumption says: what you persistently imagine and feel as real will manifest in your world . In this view, Sodom and Gomorrah are not distant, physical locales but inner bastions of fear, self-judgement and craving. Their name itself—often linked to “burning” or “oppression”—hints at the fiery, consuming nature of these assumptions. Sodom represents the sensory-driven self , indulging in every desire without regard for higher purpose. Gomorrah embodies the self-condemning mind , con...

Genesis 9:20–27 through the Teachings of Neville Goddard “And Noah began to be a man of the earth, and he planted a vineyard. And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent.” (Genesis 9:20–21 YLT, Some translations are ambiguous but typically point to the earth) After the flood—after the great purification of consciousness—Noah plants a vineyard, makes wine, and becomes drunk. But this story is about more than wine or weakness. Through the symbolic understanding Neville Goddard brings to Scripture, we see this moment as a warning: the danger of getting caught up in external reality and forgetting that the inner world—our imagination—is what shapes life. Noah Becomes a Man of the Earth The Bible tells us Noah “began to be a man of the earth.” This marks a shift—from spiritual awareness to fixation on the physical. He becomes a husbandman, a worker of the ground—the outer world—symbolising a mind that, once awake to inner cause, now becomes absorbed in t...

The story of Sodom and Gomorrah in the Bible is often misinterpreted as a tale of divine punishment for immorality, particularly targeting the LGBTQ+ community. However, seen through Neville Goddard’s understanding of consciousness and imagination , the story becomes a  metaphor for the transformation of the mind. At its heart is the revelation of creative power—and the initial resistance to it. The narrative symbolises the burning away of old, fixed beliefs and the emergence of a new way of thinking, one that aligns with creative freedom and delight in the imagination. The Discovery of Manifestation: Abraham and Sarah as States of Awareness Abraham and Sarah represent symbolic states of consciousness within the individual. They are not historical figures but inner postures—states that wrestle with belief, imagination, and the limits imposed by reason or experience. The biblical promise that Abraham will become the father of many nations is a metaphor for the birth of expanded pos...

In Neville Goddard’s teaching, the Bible is not a record of external history, but a psychological drama in which every character, place, and event symbolises states of consciousness. One of the most revealing examples is Moab — a nation that, throughout Scripture, stands in tension with Israel. In the language of states, Moab is not “out there” but a condition in us, born when the old self is not truly left behind. The Name and Meaning of Moab The name Moab (Hebrew: מואב) means from father ( mo-ab ). In Hebrew symbolism , the first syllable mo (from the letter Mem ) evokes water, the womb, or the creative mother; Ab means father. Moab therefore carries the idea of the union of mother and father. Yet in the biblical narrative, Moab’s origin is not from a new, free union, but from one bound to the past. Genesis 2:24 declares: “Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.” Spiritually understood, this is the law...

When reading the Bible with a symbolic or metaphysical eye, one might wonder about the significance of the many tribal names that end in "-ite"—such as Moabites, Ammonites, Canaanites, and others. In the literal reading, these are names of ethnic groups or regions. However, in the framework offered by Neville Goddard, these tribes take on rich inner meaning as symbols of the states of consciousness we must either transcend or transform on our journey of spiritual awakening. What Does the "-ite" Mean? The suffix "-ite" comes from the Hebrew ending "-i," which denotes "of" or "belonging to." Thus: Moabites = people of Moab (descendants of Lot's son Moab) Ammonites = people of Ammon (descendants of Lot's other son, Ben-Ammi) Canaanites = people of Canaan (a geographic region and ancestral name) In essence, these names point to those who belong to a particular mindset or inner world. The battles with these...

One of the clearest signs that the Bible is not meant to be read literally lies in the unsettling nature of many of its family narratives. When interpreted at face value, these stories can appear incestuous, violent, or morally questionable. But when understood symbolically—as a map of the mind and its inner workings—these same stories take on profound psychological meaning. The ‘family’ becomes a network of thoughts and states of consciousness: the father a dominant belief, the mother the receptive subconscious, and the children the manifestations born from their union. What seems inappropriate on the surface is, in fact, a coded portrayal of how mental states interact and perpetuate themselves within us. This shift in perspective moves the Bible from a troubling historical account to a deeply relevant manual for inner transformation. Take, for instance, the story of Lot and his daughters . Literally interpreted, it’s deeply disturbing. But symbolically, Lot represents a lingering at...

The story of Judah and Tamar in Genesis 38, when read through Neville Goddard’s teachings, reveals a powerful truth: even a small or hesitant assumption automatically calls forth what was once hidden or ignored.  This story is often overlooked when read literally because it appears to imply incest. However, on a psychological level, the “father-in-law” connection symbolises the mind conceptually joined to imagination through the Law of Assumption. Judah symbolises the mind beginning to play with (or “toy with”) the Law of Assumption, while Tamar represents imagination waiting quietly, ready to respond. Tamar: The Imagination in Waiting Tamar stands for the creative power of imagination that has been set aside. She isn’t active on her own; she is veiled, waiting to be called . Her “widowhood” shows imagination without clear direction, left waiting because Judah (the conscious self) delays fully embracing the Law . Judah’s Hesitation and Movement Judah holds back from giving ...

The stories of Reuben lying with his father’s concubine (Genesis 35:22) and Judah’s union with Tamar (Genesis 38) are more than moral lessons. They symbolise two different states of awareness engaging with the Law of Assumption — the process of shifting from the old self to the new imagined self . This is reflected in Genesis 2:24: “Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.” This is not about literal marriage but about leaving behind the old, inherited identity and uniting with the new inner self. Reuben: Clinging to the Old Reuben, the firstborn, represents the old self holding on to inherited ways. His act of lying with Bilhah, his father’s concubine, symbolises trying to claim identity through past habits rather than transformation. “Reuben went and lay with Bilhah his father's concubine...” (Genesis 35:22) Reuben refuses to leave the old self behind, attempting assumption without real change. ...

Okay, let’s talk about the crucifixion. It’s one of the most epic stories in the Bible, and for Neville Goddard, it’s the ultimate lesson in sticking to your guns— or in this case, your vision —even when things seem awfully painful. Jesus represents the imagination in Neville’s teachings, and the whole crucifixion scene? It’s a symbol for holding fast to your desired state even when it feels like the universe is mocking you. Like, Jesus is on the cross, the crowd is jeering, and things seem grim, but he's basically saying, “I know what’s happening here. Stay with me, this will work out." So yeah, being nailed to a cross doesn’t exactly scream “this feels great” —and Neville doesn’t sugarcoat it either. He knows that sticking to your imagination's vision can be intense , and let’s be real, it's usually not all rainbows and sunshine. In The Power of Awareness , he says: "In the end, you will discover that the world is not the cause of your problems, but merely t...

If you’ve ever spent time reading through the Bible—especially the Old Testament—you may have noticed something curious: a lot of names end in “el.” Names like Daniel, Gabriel, Samuel, Ezekiel, and Emmanuel . This isn’t a coincidence or just a quirk of ancient languages. From the mystical lens of Neville Goddard’s teachings , this pattern reveals something deeply profound. The Hidden Power of “El” In Hebrew, “El” means God . It's one of the oldest names used for the Divine, and it forms the foundation of many compound names in the Bible. But Neville Goddard, who taught that the Bible is not historical but psychological , would urge us to look deeper. To Neville, God is not a man in the sky —not some external force judging you from above. God is your own wonderful human imagination . Every reference to God in the Bible, including “El,” is a reference to your I AM , the awareness of being, the creative power that shapes your reality from within. So when you see “El” in a name, it’s...

Growing up, my mother was heavily focused on appearances, constantly striving to keep up with the latest trends. She followed a version of Christianity that emphasised how others saw her—how she looked and how she was perceived. This focus on external validation often left me feeling invisible. I was constantly expected to meet the standards set by others, rather than being encouraged to discover and express who I truly was. In fact, there was a time when I jokingly thought I’d been raised on a set from Keeping Up Appearances . You know, the sitcom where the character Hyacinth Bucket (pronounced "Bouquet", of course) was always going to extreme lengths to make sure she appeared perfectly in front of others. My mother had a similar flair for outward appearances—her fixation on social status and how things looked from the outside was almost comical at times. There was always this pressure to be perfect and conform, just like Hyacinth, but behind the scenes, I often felt unseen—...

We read in Isaiah: " Behold, the former things have come to pass, and new things I now declare; before they spring forth I tell you of them .” - Isaiah 42:9 " For behold, I create new heavens and a new earth, and the former things shall not be remembered or come into mind. " - Isaiah 65:17 Repentance is one of those words that carries a lot of weight—usually heavy. In traditional religious settings, it often conjures images of guilt, sorrow, and begging for forgiveness . It's typically understood as a turning away from sin, a remorseful confession followed by moral correction. But Neville Goddard offers something radically different: a version of repentance not grounded in guilt, but in the creative power of consciousness. This post explores the contrast between the traditional view of repentance and Neville Goddard’s teaching, which reframes repentance as a psychological shift—a change in mindset , assumption, and self-concept. Traditional Repentance: A Moral Du...