The Book of Job is often cited as a testament to patience under suffering, yet Neville Goddard reveals that its true focus is far subtler: an inner struggle against the inherited belief in retribution. In his February 1, 1963 lecture, Neville emphasises that Job’s trials are not external punishments but metaphors for the purifying process of consciousness. This article explores how obsession with divine retribution distorts our understanding of suffering and how Job’s story, as interpreted by Neville, beckons us toward a God of mercy and grace.
Job: More Than a Test of Patience
Many regard Job as “the persecuted one,” a righteous figure tested by Satan. Neville challenges this view, describing it as a misquotation rooted in a literal reading of the text. In reality, Job represents every individual’s ego—the part of us clinging to beliefs of divine justice rather than recognising the unfathomable mercy of imagination.
“Tonight we will speak on the Book of Job, possibly the most misquoted book in the world. I dare say all day long you use passages, and you aren’t aware you are misquoting this Book of Job… You and I have heard it as ‘the persecuted one,’ but the central point of the narrative is that Job was completely innocent—not guilty of any offense, but simply the victim of the most cruel experiment by God… It’s a prologue to an inner drama, not merely an outward test of patience.”
From the outset, Neville invites us to see Job’s “woes”—loss of property, family, health—as symbolic stages of inner purification. Each calamity strips away external attachments until Job’s consciousness reaches “rock bottom,” ready for transformation.
The Illusion of Retributive Justice
Job’s insistence on defending his virtue (see chapters 30–31) arises from a deeply ingrained conviction: that suffering must be punishment for wrongdoing. This belief in a God of retribution blocks the path to inner freedom. Neville observes that if Job truly believed in pure mercy, these trials could not bind him.
“In the 30th and 31st chapters of Job, he makes the most eloquent defence of his virtues… But how can he be acquitted if he still believes in retribution? These things could not have happened if he believed that way… He did not know of the God of mercy. He only knew the God of retribution, and God is a God of mercy… The last cry on the cross: ‘Father, forgive them. They know not what they do.’ But man doesn’t WANT to forgive… And to think, ‘Well, he’s not [burning]… millions feel ‘that isn’t a good God.’”
In Neville’s framework, those who “comfort” Job—his friends—symbolise false beliefs that propound suffering as deserved. They reinforce Job’s obsession with retribution, urging him to justify his plight rather than transform his inner state.
Repentance as Radical Change of Attitude
According to Neville, true repentance (Greek: metanoia) is not remorse over sin but a complete reversal of attitude. When trials arise, we must refuse to accept them as final or justified. In a follow-up Q&A, Neville underscores that Job should have immediately exercised his creative power rather than attempt to excuse himself.
“In the midst of the flames, use God’s law. If tonight I found myself COMPLETELY behind the eight ball… part of my training, then let me use God’s law, and exercise my talent to come out of that pit. I don’t accept it as final. I don’t even accept it as temporary… Repent means ‘change your attitude.’”
Attempting to defend one’s virtue under a retributive mindset only deepens the delusion. Neville argues that Job’s fundamental error was asking “Why?” rather than turning inward to imagine relief:
“Job’s big mistake was attempting to ‘defend’ his virtues, assuming he would be judged by a law of retribution. ... When you find yourself (in the pit), don’t start digging and say ‘What have I done?’ as Job did… Repent! Don’t accept any sentence! You get out of it by exercising your talent that God gave you…”
This shift—from outward defence to inward creation—marks the transition from a consciousness bound by retribution to one awakened to mercy.
The Refining Fire of Consciousness
Neville likens Job’s trials to the refining of gold. Just as gold must endure fire to separate it from dross, the individual must face inner “woes” to shed false assumptions. Only when the dross is removed does imagination (our “gold”) remain—pure, malleable, and free to shape new realities.
“If you have a piece of gold…and it’s not pure—you must put it in the fire to bring it into a molten state, that it may separate itself from the dross. And when it’s completely pure…you can put it into any state you want.”
“Man’s purification comes by the death of his delusions, and He always will use the one you hate to be your good Samaritan… Everything is for God’s purpose and Hell is just self-justification… So man’s purification comes by the death of his delusions.”
These “woes” are not punitive; they are purgative. Each loss—sheep, camels, oxen, children—corresponds to shedding layers of pride, tradition, and inherited dogma. Only when Job’s outer identity “dies” does he realise that his true self, imagination, remains intact.
From Hearing to Seeing: The Revelation of Mercy
The climax occurs in Job 42:5–6, when Job declares:
“I have heard of thee by the hearing of the ear; but now mine eye seeth thee… I abhor myself, and repent in dust and ashes.”
Here, “hearing” symbolises all the inherited ideas of a retributive God. “Seeing” signifies the direct experience of God as imagination, the wellspring of mercy that never punishes. Neville emphasises that this revelation is the pivotal moment when Job discards the old paradigm:
“One day, when you least expect it, God will reveal Himself to you and you will say: ‘I have heard of you by the hearing of the ear… but now mine eye seeth thee.’ It doesn’t matter what the world says, I see something entirely different. You are not at all what they told me you were… He appears to come from without, but really He comes from within.”
That shift—from a “hearing” mind to a “seeing” consciousness—liberates Job from the obsession with retribution. He no longer clings to justifying his suffering but recognises that what truly shapes reality is imagination, not a punitive deity.
Restoration: Mercy Multiplied
In the final chapters, Job’s fortunes are restored “double” (Job 42:10), a powerful metaphor: once dross is removed, imagination can generate abundance far exceeding previous loss. Job’s new family—his “sons and daughters”—symbolises fresh ideas born of a purified consciousness. What was once bound by fear and retribution now thrives in gratitude and creative freedom.
Conclusion
Neville Goddard’s interpretation of Job shatters the illusion of a retributive God and replaces it with the profound realisation that imagination is divine mercy. Obsession with retribution keeps us trapped in fear and self-justification, perpetuating suffering rather than transforming it. By embracing Job’s journey—from hearing to seeing—we learn to refuse any sentence, repent through a shift of attitude, and allow the refining fire to purify our consciousness. In doing so, we align with the God of mercy within, ready to manifest abundance beyond measure.
References
-
Neville Goddard, “The Book of Job” (1 February 1963 lecture transcript)
-
Neville Goddard, Q&A “What Job SHOULD Have Done” (transcribed by Max Harrick Shenk)
Comments
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comment! Comments are reviewed before publishing.